Welcome To Health Advice Info!

Health Advice Info Article:

A history of drug ads on TV

It seems like only yesterday when Direct-to-Consumer Advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs didn’t exist. Now, of course, it can’t be avoided. Let’s take a look at the history of this practice and see if we can explain how this all came about.

Before 1980, there was no such thing as DTCA. The times just weren’t right. But in 1981, a few drug companies made small forays into this unchartered territory. The reaction of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was to impose a moratorium on all DTCA so it could research the issue. After a few years, the moratorium was lifted, but essentially it only allowed print advertising in magazines and the like. But it took 14 more years before the FDA issued rules on how to undertake TV advertising.

Why print and not TV? The answer is in the fine print - the fine print in this case being the package insert or the full prescribing information (you know, that little folded up piece of paper that comes in drug boxes and magically opens into something the size of a towel?). More specifically, the fine print refers to the so-called brief summary.

So in the early days, it was in a nutshell: no brief summary no drug ads on TV. But some of you may recall the early days of TV DTCA during which there were a number of very bizarre TV ads that seemed to say nothing. The prototype were the original ads for Rogaine, which said “Did you know that Rogaine was minoxidil?” or “I didn’t know that minoxidil was Rogaine.” Unless you already new what Rogaine was, these ads were quite baffling.

This happened because the FDA Regulations stated that a product could advertise itself on TV if it only presented the brand and generic names (both are required) and more importantly there could be no representation of what the drug was for. The regulations were intended to allow drug companies to detail doctors on their products, and since they would then know what the drugs were for, reminders that just called attention to the name would be worthwhile (for the drug companies).

Now we understand the premise behind those seemingly absurd ads. As reminder ads, they were perfectly legal, but they caused a whole lot of confusion, particularly among regular people who might not have known what those drugs were for. All they could do was to sit and scratch their heads. You still occasionally see these ads such as the ones with people surfing through corn fields saying nothing more than ask your doctor about, let’s say, Allegra (fexofenadine).

We’re coming into the home stretch here, the modern era of DTCA on TV. In 1995, the FDA relented and devised a scheme that they felt everyone could live with. The key phrase in the Regulations that they took advantage of was that ads require a brief summary “unless there are adequate means of disseminating the full prescribing information.” So FDA crafted a set of rules that would be considered “adequate means.” The ads would have to have four components: a toll-free number for people to call to obtain the PI, a reference to see a magazine where they were concurrently running a print ad (so the person could read the accompanying brief summary), a Web site where the PI could be found and lastly, instructions to ask your doctor or pharmacist for more complete information - got that? Well, the drug companies sure did, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Is TV DTCA here forever? Not necessarily. The FDA has been charged with studying the impacts of DTCA and if they or others were to prove significant negative outcomes, it wouldn’t take FDA very long to say: “Remember that stuff about ‘adequate means?’ well we just decided that the four criteria aren’t enough, and you must now include the entire brief summary.” Of course, they could just as easily say the same thing without any data, but even the FDA likes to practice safe regulating! And lastly, Congress could always write new laws precluding TV ads for prescription drugs. Stay tuned.

Ed Zimney, M.D.

Dr Z's blog can be found at http://blog.healthtalk.com/zimney/

For more information, articles and programs on Diseases, Health, Medicine and making the right choices please visit http://healthtalk.com/

Sometimes you are tempted with all the food and drink products, especially when thirst or hunger arises. Avoid from all these tempting products that are usually endorsed as having low calories.

As you want to achieve your weight loss goals faster, a personal trainer may be the answer for you. Working with a personal trainer will definitely have you burning more calories than working out by yourself. Such are burning more calories you will have to starve yourself to keep the weight off. A weight-loss program that is combined with a training program will produce excellent results for you in a shorter period of time than just doing a weight-loss program by itself. You will get in shape and love the way you look.

If you want to stay fit, you consider fitness training. It is not just for elite athletes, by can benefit anyone who wants to get in better shape. You can do this at home or you can join a health club. You could even join a group that does fitness training together. It may be a better idea to join a fitness club where you are with other people.

Did you know that Nature designed your body to always have naturally firm skin? Its true! The normal function of skin cells is to manufacture lots of structural proteins and fatty acids which keep your skin naturally moist, firm, smooth and even-toned.

Health is a state of wellness and being free from all forms of illness. It is important that we keep our health in check to prolong our lives. This involves avoiding lifestyles, and other habits that can be dangerous to your health.

Taking a sauna is renowned to be a very healthful thing to do, and many people make it a habit to use a sauna at least twice a week. The Finns have more saunas in their country than any other country, and much of what we know about the sauna comes from the Finns.

It is difficult to ascertain what health benefits can be achieved through the use of saunas, and what health benefits are more or less imagined by some users. Granted, everyone agrees that general blood flow is increased, and the pores to the skin benefit highly, but what are other claims that may not be substantiated?

If ever you've wanted a sauna in your home, your basement is probably the very best location for one. First you are going to have to figure out the dimensions of the sauna you desire. Just be sure to have a water source at the location, and then contact a manufacturer of precut saunas. In return they will send you a kit with all precut boards that are neatly labeled, and you will also receive a thermometer, a heater, benches and a pre-hung door.

In the old world, sauna use was common only in such areas as Finland and the other Baltic countries, however the modern world has embraced the use of saunas for their tremendous health benefits as well as the relief of pain and the overall analgesic properties of the steam. The modern world has spread the use of sauna cultures, and now they can be found all over the world.

The answer to the above question is actually no, as there are different kinds of heaters that will heat saunas. The four most common heaters are wood fired, electric, gas and infrared. Thus if you have natural gas already in your home, you may consider placing a gas heater in your home sauna. It pays to have a sauna heater commercially installed because of numerous factors, such as ventilation and thus it may also need clearance.